The effect of trade policy uncertainty, free cash flow, investment opportunity set, and liquidity on dividend policy of food and beverage sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, 2022–2025

Authors

  • Aprilia Lumenta Sam Ratulangi University
  • Lawren Julio Rumokoy Sam Ratulangi University
  • Priskila Bernita Rottie Sam Ratulangi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.523

Keywords:

trade policy uncertainty, free cash flow, investment opportunity set, liquidity, dividend policy

Abstract

Shifts in international trade policy may change how firms divide cash between shareholders and retention, yet evidence on this link for emerging-market firms remains scarce. This study examines whether trade policy uncertainty (TPU), free cash flow, the investment opportunity set (IOS), and liquidity are associated with the dividend payout ratio of food and beverage firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Drawing on agency, signaling, and pecking-order perspectives, we analyze a balanced panel of 27 regular dividend-paying firms over 2022–2025 (108 firm-year observations) using random-effects regression with standard errors clustered by firm, selected through Chow, Lagrange multiplier, and Hausman tests. IOS is the only variable significantly and positively associated with payout; the association is economically meaningful, equal to about one-third of the standard deviation of payout per standard-deviation increase in IOS, and it also holds in a fixed-effects specification. TPU, free cash flow, and liquidity show no statistically significant association, although the estimates are imprecise and do not rule out sizeable effects, and the model as a whole has low explanatory power. These results indicate that, among regular payers, payout is related more to the market’s valuation of growth prospects than to trade policy uncertainty. Because TPU varies only by year, the sample excludes non-payers, and no control variables are included, the findings are associations and should not be generalized to non-paying firms. The study provides a baseline for future research using firm-level exposure to trade policy and broader samples.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and "the bird in the hand" fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003330

Caldara, D., Iacoviello, M., Molligo, P., Prestipino, A., & Raffo, A. (2020). The economic effects of trade policy uncertainty. Journal of Monetary Economics, 109, 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.11.002

Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner's guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317

DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Stulz, R. M. (2006). Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.07.005

Denis, D. J., & Osobov, I. (2008). Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.06.006

Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review, 74(4), 650–659. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805130

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00038-1

Fitri, N. L., Pangaribuan, D., & Yuniati, T. (2024). Pengaruh free cash flow, investment opportunity set dan struktur modal terhadap kebijakan dividen pada perusahaan food and beverage [The effect of free cash flow, investment opportunity set, and capital structure on dividend policy in food and beverage companies]. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(2), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v3i2.2324

Friza, R. J. (2022). Pengaruh investment opportunity set, likuiditas, dan kebijakan hutang terhadap dividend policy pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2015–2019 [The effect of investment opportunity set, liquidity, and debt policy on dividend policy in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, 2015–2019]. Jurnal Manajemen Terapan dan Keuangan, 11(3), 741–754. https://doi.org/10.22437/jmk.v11i03.17999

Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 26 (10th edition) [Multivariate analysis applications with the IBM SPSS 26 program]. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gulen, H., & Ion, M. (2016). Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(3), 523–564. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv050

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00199

Lee, C.-C., Wang, C.-W., Huang, C.-W., & Sharma, S. S. (2025). Corporate dividend behavior under uncertainty: A study of Chinese firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 91, Article 102747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102747

Li, C., Zhao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty and cash dividend policy: Evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 542. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03055-9

Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American Economic Review, 46(2), 97–113. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1910664

Mayangsari, S., Putra, Y. P., & Yuniarti Zs, N. (2024). Pengaruh likuiditas, leverage, profitabilitas, risiko bisnis, dan free cash flow terhadap kebijakan dividen pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI (2015–2022) [The effect of liquidity, leverage, profitability, business risk, and free cash flow on dividend policy in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX (2015–2022)]. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Teknologi Informasi Akuntansi, 5(2), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.36085/jakta.v5i2.6888

Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411–433. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2351143

Miller, M. H., & Rock, K. (1985). Dividend policy under asymmetric information. The Journal of Finance, 40(4), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328393

Munawar, D., & Indrawan, I. G. A. (2024). Pengaruh investment opportunity set (IOS) dan kinerja keuangan terhadap kebijakan dividen [The effect of investment opportunity set (IOS) and financial performance on dividend policy]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Ekonomi, 9(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.21067/jrpe.v9i2.10541

Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913646

Natsir, A., Murni, S., & Pondaag, J. J. (2023). Pengaruh profitabilitas, likuiditas, dan pertumbuhan penjualan terhadap kebijakan dividen perusahaan sektor food and beverage yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia [The effect of profitability, liquidity, and sales growth on the dividend policy of food and beverage sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange]. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 11(1), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v11i1.45322

Ratih, I. A. M., & Surasmi, I. A. (2025). Pengaruh free cash flow, kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial, arus kas operasi dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kebijakan dividen pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2021–2023 [The effect of free cash flow, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, operating cash flow, and firm size on dividend policy in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, 2021–2023]. Wicaksana: Jurnal Lingkungan dan Pembangunan, 9(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.22225/wicaksana.9.1.2025.46-61

Rumokoy, L. J., Lengkong, V., Chung, R., & Liu, B. (2025). Geopolitical risk and IPO underpricing: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 86, Article 108784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108784

Rumokoy, L. J., Liu, B., & Chung, R. (2024). Do board networks matter for corporate cash holdings? Evidence from Australian firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(7), 1695–1723. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2023-0216

Rumokoy, L. J., Omura, A., & Roca, E. (2023). Geopolitical risk and corporate investment in the metals and mining industry: Evidence from Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, Article 101991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101991

Saptiwi, E. D., Lestari, U. P., & Arumsari, P. D. (2022). Pengaruh likuiditas, free cash flow, debt to equity ratio, dan earning per share terhadap kebijakan dividen: Studi pada perusahaan pertambangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2015–2020. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomika & Sains, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.54066/jiesa.v3i2.252

Setiawati, A. N., & Simanungkalit, R. H. M. (2025). Pengaruh profitabilitas, likuiditas, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kebijakan dividen. Jurnal Sosial dan Sains, 5(3), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsosains.v5i3.32073

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Sudarno, Renaldo, N., Hutauruk, M. B., Junaedi, A. T., & Suyono. (2022). Teori penelitian keuangan [Financial research theory]. CV Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D [Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods]. Alfabeta.

Tatinting, M., Wullur, M., & Tumiwa, J. R. (2025). Pengaruh institutional ownership, leverage, dan liquidity terhadap kebijakan dividen perusahaan indeks LQ45 sektor non-keuangan periode 2019–2024 [The effect of institutional ownership, leverage, and liquidity on the dividend policy of non-financial LQ45 index companies, 2019–2024]. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 13(3), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v13i03.63705

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2026). Global trade update (January 2026): Top trends redefining global trade in 2026. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditcinf2025d11_en.pdf

Wahyuni, E. S. (2021). Pengaruh leverage, likuiditas, profitabilitas dan pertumbuhan perusahaan terhadap kebijakan dividen [The effect of leverage, liquidity, profitability, and company growth on dividend policy]. Jurnal Ekonomika dan Manajemen, 10(1), 46–55. https://journal.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/ema/article/view/1770

Yani, H. E., & Maharani, N. K. (2022). Pengaruh profitabilitas, lagged dividend, dan investment opportunity set terhadap kebijakan dividen [The effect of profitability, lagged dividend, and investment opportunity set on dividend policy]. AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional, 4(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.54783/jin.v4i2.570

Downloads

Published

2026-11-03

How to Cite

Lumenta, A., Rumokoy, L. J., & Rottie, P. B. (2026). The effect of trade policy uncertainty, free cash flow, investment opportunity set, and liquidity on dividend policy of food and beverage sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, 2022–2025. The Contrarian : Finance, Accounting, and Business Research, 5(2), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.523

Issue

Section

Articles