Pengaruh Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness dan Perceived Risk terhadap pembayaran Cashless pada UMKM di Kota Manado

Authors

  • Diony Jasinta Mangambe Sam Ratulangi University
  • Winston Pontoh Sam Ratulangi University
  • Christian Datu Sam Ratulangi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58784/mbkk.355

Keywords:

perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived risk, cashless

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has transformed global payment systems, including in Indonesia, with the increasing adoption of cashless payments that offer greater efficiency, security, and accessibility compared to conventional methods. However, the adoption rate of this technology among Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) remains varied. This study aims to examine the influence of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and perceived risk on cashless payment usage among MSMEs in Manado City. A quantitative approach was employed with a population comprising MSME actors who use cashless payments. A total of 95 respondents were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected via questionnaires and analyzed using multiple linear regression with the JAMOVI software. The results reveal that perceived ease of use has a positive and significant effect on cashless payments, perceived usefulness has a positive but insignificant effect, and perceived risk has a negative and insignificant effect. These findings indicate that ease of use is the primary driver of cashless payment adoption among MSMEs, while perceived usefulness and perceived risk do not significantly influence adoption. This study contributes to the development of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) literature in the MSME context and provides practical implications for digital payment service providers to enhance cashless payment adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adiwardana, F. H., Suparman, S., Riyanto, S., Darmawan, L., & Khairunisa, A. W. (2025). Pengaruh pembayaran sistem cashless terhadap minat pembelian mahasiswa sekolah vokasi IPB University. Jurnal Nomosleca. 11(1). https://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/n/article/view/14942

Auliya, S. N., Rahman, A., & Purwanto, D. (2022). Fenomena perilaku konsumsi menggunakan sistem pembayaran cashless (Studi kasus masyarakat di kabupaten Kendal). Sosio E-Kons, 14(1), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.30998/sosioekons.v14i1.11924

Darista, S. M. R., & Mujilan. (2021). Pengaruh persepsi kegunaan, persepsi kemudahan, persepsi kepercayaan dan persepsi risiko terhadap minat penggunaan aplikasi OVO sebagai alat pembayaran e-money. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Akuntansi. 9(1), https://jurnal.ukwms.ac.id/index.php/jrma/article/view/6619

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Fazriansyah, Sari, N. A., & Mawardi. (2022). Apakah persepsi kemudahan penggunaan dan persepsi kegunaan berpengaruh terhadap niat untuk menggunakan dan penggunaan aktual pada aplikasi pembayaran digital?. Jurnal Manajemen, 14(2), 271-283. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jmmn.v14i2.11126

Juan, E., & Indrawati, L. (2023). Pengaruh kepercayaan, persepsi kemudahan penggunaan, dan brand image terhadap kepuasan konsumen melakukan pembayaran menggunakan QRIS. Konsumen & Konsumsi: Jurnal Manajemen, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.32524/kkjm.v2i1.757

Katarina, B., & Hendro. (2021). Pengaruh perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness & perceived risk terhadap penggunaan cashless. Jurnal Paradigma Akutansi, 3(1), 238-247. https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/jpa/article/view/11508

Lukito, S., & Khairunnisa, K. (2022). Pengaruh persepsi kemudahan dan persepsi keamanan terhadap cashless society. Jurnal Informasi Akuntansi (JIA), 1(2). https://journal.ukmc.ac.id/index.php/jia/article/view/588

Monica, F., & Japarianto, E. (2022). Analisa pengaruh perceived ease of use dan melalui perceived enjoyment terhadap behavior intention pada digital payment. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 16(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.9744/pemasaran.16.1.9-15

Muliadi, M. L., & Japarianto, E. . (2021). Analisa pengaruh perceived ease of use terhadap behavior intention melalui perceived usefulness sebagai media intervening pada digital payment Ovo. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 15(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.9744/pemasaran.15.1.20-27

Napitupulu N. L., & Ikhwan, H. S. (2024). Pengaruh persepsi risiko dan persepsi kemudahan terhadap minat menggunakan pembayaran dengan quick response code indonesian standar (qris) dengan dimediasi kepercayaan: Studi kasus pada mahasiswa universitas Gunadarma. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 9(12), . https://jurnal.syntaxliterate.co.id/index.php/syntax-literate/article/view/17103

Pratiwi, S., & Sofwan, A. (2022). The influence of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risk and trust on interest using fintech Shopeepay. Jurnal Rekognisi Akuntansi , 6(2), 141-154. https://journal.unisnu.ac.id/jra/article/view/jra.v6i2.434

Prihayudha, E. K., & Soepatini. (2023). Pengaruh perceived ease of use, usefulness dan perceived risk terhadap intention to use (Studi empiris penggunaan aplikasi Ovo pada konsumen di Surakarta). Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(5), 7573–7587. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/5652

Rahman, M. A., Warokka, A., & Priyati, R. Y. (2024). Minat penggunaan cashless payment sistem dompet digital pada mahasiswa di Papua Barat. Scientific Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 7(3), 852-867. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v7i3.909

Sabaah, R., Welsa, H., & Ningrum, N. K. (2025). Pengaruh perceived usefulness dan perceived ease of use terhadap intention to use dengan attitude sebagai variabel intervening (Studi Kasus E-Wallet di Yogyakarta). OIKOS: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 9(2), 457-470. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/oikos/article/view/12832

Setiawan, S. (2022). Pengaruh perceived ease of use dan perceived service credibility terhadap intention of use mobile payment di Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 6(3), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmbk.v6i3.18673

Setiawan, M. N., dan Solihin, A. (2023). Pengaruh persepsi kemudahan, kegunaandan kepercayaan terhadap minat menggunakan Gopay (Studi kasus di Karawang). Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Sosial (EMBISS), 4(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.59889/embiss.v4i1.278

Simangunsong, J. K. M., Rizal, M., & Harahap, K. (2025). Pengaruh perceived value, perceived risk, dan kualitas informasi akuntansi terhadap kepuasan pengguna digital payment pada umkm di Kota Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(1), 7874–7897. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/25788

Surayaningsih, I. B. (2014). Trust vs perceived risk. Dream Litera Buana

Tyas, E. I., & Darma, E. S. (2017). Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Enjoyment, dan Actual Usage Terhadap Penerimaan Teknologi Informasi: Studi Empiris Pada Karyawan Bagian Akuntansi dan Keuangan Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil Wilayah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 1(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.18196/rab.010103

Vinatan, T. (2023). Pengaruh persepsi kegunaan, persepsi kemudahan, dan pengaruh sosial terhadap minat menggunakan media sosial pada mahasiswa fakultas bisnis dan akuntansi di Universitas Katolik Musi Charitas. Konsumen & Konsumsi : Jurnal Manajemen, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.32524/kkjm.v2i1.482

Vo, T. T. N., & Nguyen, C. T. K. (2015). Factors influencing customer perceived quality and purchase intention toward private labels in the vietnam market: The moderating effects of store image. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(4), 51–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/jabe.v7i2.7553

Downloads

Published

2025-08-15

How to Cite

Mangambe, D. J., Pontoh, W., & Datu, C. (2025). Pengaruh Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness dan Perceived Risk terhadap pembayaran Cashless pada UMKM di Kota Manado. Manajemen Bisnis Dan Keuangan Korporat, 3(2), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.58784/mbkk.355

Issue

Section

Articles