Analisis kinerja keuangan perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM)

Authors

  • Junior T. A. Lalonsang Sam Ratulangi University
  • Herman Karamoy Sam Ratulangi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58784/mbkk.168

Keywords:

financial performance, multi attribute, analytical hierarchy process

Abstract

Financial performance analysis is an essential tool for objectively evaluating the health and effectiveness of banks. This study aims to analyze the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange using the Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) method. This research is qualitative with a descriptive and comparative approach. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used to determine the criteria weights, while the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is employed to rank the companies based on their performance. The data used includes key financial ratios such as DER, ROA, ROE, NIM, Cost to Income Ratio, Operating Margin, Current Ratio, and Quick Ratio. The results show that based on the AHP method, Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Syariah (BTPS) has the best performance, followed by Bank Central Asia (BBCA), Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BBRI), Bank Mega (MEGA), and Bank Mandiri (BMRI). Meanwhile, the TOPSIS method results indicate that Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Syariah (BTPS) remains in the top position, followed by Bank Central Asia (BBCA), Bank Mega (MEGA), Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BBRI), and Bank Mandiri (BMRI). These differences highlight the variation in the relative assessment of each criterion depending on the approach used. This study concludes that MADM, particularly AHP and TOPSIS, is effective in comprehensively and objectively evaluating the financial performance of banking companies, providing valuable insights for stakeholders in the Indonesian banking sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atan, R., Abdul Raman, S., Sawiran, M. S., Mohamed, N., & Mail, R. (2010). Financial performance of Malaysian local authorities: A trend analysis. 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2010), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSR.2010.5773782

Azmi, S. N., & Takarini, N. (2022) Analisis kinerja keuangan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 11(2), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.32502/jimn.v11i2.3527.

Fawzi, N. S., Kamaluddin, A., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2015). Monitoring distressed companies through cash flow analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01092-8.

Karande, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Chakraborty, S. (2016). A study on the ranking performance of some MCDM methods for industrial robot selection problems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 7, 399-422. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2016.1.001

Prihadi, T. (2019). Analisis laporan keuangan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Qin, Y., Qi, Q., Shi, P., Lou, S., Scott, P. J., & Jiang, X. (2023). Multi-Attribute decision-making methods in additive manufacturing: The state of the art. Processes, 11(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020497

Sarraf, A. Z., Mohaghar, A., & Bazargani, H. (2013). Developing TOPSIS method using statistical normalization for selecting knowledge management strategies. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(4). 860-875. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.573

Savitri, E. (2016). Konservatisme akuntansi: Cara pengukuran, tinjauan empiris dan factor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Sahila

Setiadi., & Sibarani, B. B. (2019). Materialitas pada proses audit. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi Unsurya, 4(2), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.35968/jbau.v4i2.335.

Shapira, A., & Goldenberg, M. (2005). AHP-Based equipment selection model for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(12), 1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:12(1263)

Sinaga, I. R., Sondakh, J. J., & Warongan, J. D. L. (2024). The influence of independence, integrity, professionalism, and objectivity on fraud prevention in auditors with auditor ethics as a moderating variable: Empirical study at the Representative Office of the Supreme Audit Agency in North Sulawesi Province. The Contrarian: Finance, Accounting, and Business Research, 3(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.135

Sorayaei, A., Pour, M. V., Zadeh, M. H., Amiri, M. R. A., & Sharifi, E. (2013). Identification and prioritization of efficiency-influencing factors in banking using MADM technique (Case study: Tejarat Bank). European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3)(s), 2745-2750. https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/1629

Tsai, P. H., Wang, Y. W., & Chang, W.C. (2023). Hybrid MADM-based study of key risk factors in house-for-pension reverse mortgage lending in Taiwan’s banking industry. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 86, 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101460

Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: CRC Press.

Widagdo, B., Jihadi, M., Bachitar, Y., Safitri, O. E., & Singh, S. K. (2020). Financial ratio, macro economy, and investment risk on sharia stock return. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 919-926. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.919

Yahya, A. S., & Setiyono (2022). Efektivitas pelayanan publik melalui sistem pengelolaan pengaduan aplikasi SP4N-LAPOR. Jurnal Media Birokrasi, 4(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.33701/jmb.v4i1.2432

Downloads

Published

2024-08-10

How to Cite

Lalonsang, J. T. A., & Karamoy, H. (2024). Analisis kinerja keuangan perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Manajemen Bisnis Dan Keuangan Korporat, 2(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.58784/mbkk.168

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Junior T. A. Lalonsang, Herman Karamoy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Under this license then authors free to:

  • Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.


Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.