Analisis kinerja keuangan perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM)

Authors

  • Junior T. A. Lalonsang Sam Ratulangi University
  • Herman Karamoy Sam Ratulangi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58784/mbkk.168

Keywords:

financial performance, multi attribute, analytical hierarchy process

Abstract

Financial performance analysis is an essential tool for objectively evaluating the health and effectiveness of banks. This study aims to analyze the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange using the Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) method. This research is qualitative with a descriptive and comparative approach. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used to determine the criteria weights, while the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is employed to rank the companies based on their performance. The data used includes key financial ratios such as DER, ROA, ROE, NIM, Cost to Income Ratio, Operating Margin, Current Ratio, and Quick Ratio. The results show that based on the AHP method, Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Syariah (BTPS) has the best performance, followed by Bank Central Asia (BBCA), Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BBRI), Bank Mega (MEGA), and Bank Mandiri (BMRI). Meanwhile, the TOPSIS method results indicate that Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Syariah (BTPS) remains in the top position, followed by Bank Central Asia (BBCA), Bank Mega (MEGA), Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BBRI), and Bank Mandiri (BMRI). These differences highlight the variation in the relative assessment of each criterion depending on the approach used. This study concludes that MADM, particularly AHP and TOPSIS, is effective in comprehensively and objectively evaluating the financial performance of banking companies, providing valuable insights for stakeholders in the Indonesian banking sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atan, R., Abdul Raman, S., Sawiran, M. S., Mohamed, N., & Mail, R. (2010). Financial performance of Malaysian local authorities: A trend analysis. 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2010), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSR.2010.5773782

Azmi, S. N., & Takarini, N. (2022) Analisis kinerja keuangan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 11(2), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.32502/jimn.v11i2.3527.

Fawzi, N. S., Kamaluddin, A., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2015). Monitoring distressed companies through cash flow analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01092-8.

Karande, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Chakraborty, S. (2016). A study on the ranking performance of some MCDM methods for industrial robot selection problems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 7, 399-422. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2016.1.001

Prihadi, T. (2019). Analisis laporan keuangan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Qin, Y., Qi, Q., Shi, P., Lou, S., Scott, P. J., & Jiang, X. (2023). Multi-Attribute decision-making methods in additive manufacturing: The state of the art. Processes, 11(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020497

Sarraf, A. Z., Mohaghar, A., & Bazargani, H. (2013). Developing TOPSIS method using statistical normalization for selecting knowledge management strategies. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(4). 860-875. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.573

Savitri, E. (2016). Konservatisme akuntansi: Cara pengukuran, tinjauan empiris dan factor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Sahila

Setiadi., & Sibarani, B. B. (2019). Materialitas pada proses audit. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi Unsurya, 4(2), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.35968/jbau.v4i2.335.

Shapira, A., & Goldenberg, M. (2005). AHP-Based equipment selection model for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(12), 1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:12(1263)

Sinaga, I. R., Sondakh, J. J., & Warongan, J. D. L. (2024). The influence of independence, integrity, professionalism, and objectivity on fraud prevention in auditors with auditor ethics as a moderating variable: Empirical study at the Representative Office of the Supreme Audit Agency in North Sulawesi Province. The Contrarian: Finance, Accounting, and Business Research, 3(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.135

Sorayaei, A., Pour, M. V., Zadeh, M. H., Amiri, M. R. A., & Sharifi, E. (2013). Identification and prioritization of efficiency-influencing factors in banking using MADM technique (Case study: Tejarat Bank). European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3)(s), 2745-2750. https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/1629

Tsai, P. H., Wang, Y. W., & Chang, W.C. (2023). Hybrid MADM-based study of key risk factors in house-for-pension reverse mortgage lending in Taiwan’s banking industry. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 86, 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101460

Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: CRC Press.

Widagdo, B., Jihadi, M., Bachitar, Y., Safitri, O. E., & Singh, S. K. (2020). Financial ratio, macro economy, and investment risk on sharia stock return. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 919-926. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.919

Yahya, A. S., & Setiyono (2022). Efektivitas pelayanan publik melalui sistem pengelolaan pengaduan aplikasi SP4N-LAPOR. Jurnal Media Birokrasi, 4(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.33701/jmb.v4i1.2432

Downloads

Published

2024-08-10

How to Cite

Lalonsang, J. T. A., & Karamoy, H. (2024). Analisis kinerja keuangan perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Manajemen Bisnis Dan Keuangan Korporat, 2(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.58784/mbkk.168

Issue

Section

Articles