The impact of audit findings and follow-up actions on audit recommendations on audit opinions of financial statements with APIP capabilities as a moderating variable (A study on provincial/regencies/cities governments in Suluttenggo Region)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.159Keywords:
audit opinions, audit findings, TLRHP, APIP capabilitiesAbstract
The audit opinion issued on government financial statements is the conclusion of the BPK audit process. These opinions provide a qualitative picture of financial management, reflecting the accountability and transparency of local government. This research analyses the influence of audit findings and follow-up actions on audit recommendations (or TLRHP) on audit opinions and examines the moderating effect of APIP capabilities on this relationship. An analytical method employed is binary logistic regression analysis with the absolute difference test. This study used secondary data from the BPK IHPS and the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (or BPKP) annual performance report. The data encompasses 37 provincial, regency, and city governments in North Sulawesi, Central Sulawesi, and Gorontalo for the fiscal period 2018 to 2022. The results reveal that audit findings have no significant impact on audit opinions. Conversely, both TLRHP and APIP capabilities have a significant influence on audit opinions. Furthermore, APIP capabilities moderate the relationship between TLRHP and audit opinions but not the relationship between audit findings and opinions.
Downloads
References
Ageng, Y. R., & Usman, F. (2023). Pengaruh kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) dan maturitas Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) terhadap opini audit. Jurnalku, 3(4), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v3i4.597
Amyulianthy, R., Anto, A. S. U., & Budi, S. (2020). Temuan dan tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan terhadap opini audit (Studi pada Pemerintah Provinsi di Indonesia). Jurnal Penelitian Akuntansi, 1(1), 14–27. https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/JPA/article/view/2409/
Bergman, M., & Lane, J.-E. (1990). Public policy in a principal-agent framework. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692890002003005
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/259223
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
Evans, Ij. H., & Patton, J. M. (1987). Signaling and monitoring in public-sector accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 25, 130–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491083
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Juniati, R. (2021). Pengaruh kapabilitas aparat pengawasan internal pemerintah dan penyelesaian tindak lanjut temuan terhadap opini laporan keuangan. Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, 18(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.31851/jmwe.v18i1.5599
Koontz, H., O’Donnell, C., & Weihrich, H. (1993). Manajemen. Erlangga.
Mutiara, R., Masnila, N., & Nurhasanah, N. (2022). Pengaruh kelemahan sistem pengendalian intern, ketidakpatuhan pada perundang-undangan dan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan terhadap opini audit Pemerintah Daerah. Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik, 4(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v4i2.99
Pratiwi, R., & Aryani, Y. A. (2017). Pengaruh karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah, Kepala Daerah, tindak lanjut temuan audit terhadap opini. Jurnal Akuntansi, 20(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v20i2.52
Rutherford, B. A. (2000). The construction and presentation of performance indicators in executive agency external reports. Financial Accountability & Management, 16(3), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00106
Salsabila, R., & Wahyudi, I. (2022). Pengaruh temuan audit, rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan, dan ukuran pemerintahan daerah terhadap opini audit pada Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional, 4(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.54783/jin.v4i1.515
Siregar, M. I., & Rudiansyah, J. (2019). Pengaruh jumlah temuan audit terhadap opini audit Kabupaten/Kota se-Sumatera. Jurnal Ecoment Global, 4(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.35908/jeg.v4i1.576
Tugiman, H. (1997). Standar profesional audit internal. Kanisius.
Zimmerman, J. L. (1977). The municipal accounting maze: An analysis of political incentives. Journal of Accounting Research, 15, 107–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490636
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dwinta Indriani, Jantje J. Tinangon, Novi S. Budiarso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Under this license then authors free to:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
